While the second straight acceleration in the headline number was expected, the pace of price gains may still surprise Bank of Canada policymakers, who cut interest rates for the seventh straight meeting. Donald Trump’s tariff threats hamper business and consumer spending. But assuming the federal sales tax break hadn’t been in place, Canadian inflation would have jumped even higher to 3% in February. This is at the upper bound of the bank’s target range, from 2.7% a month earlier. Canadian inflation has not been at or above 3% since the end of 2023.

Faster price growth was broad-based in February, the end of the goods and services tax (GST)/harmonized sales tax (HST) break through the month contributed notable upward pressure to prices for eligible products. Slower growth for gasoline prices (+5.1%) moderated the all-items CPI acceleration.

The CPI rose 1.1% m/m in February and 0.7% on a seasonally adjusted basis.  However, the increase exceeded the tax impact as seasonally-adjusted CPI excluding the tax impact was +0.4%. And, in case you want to pin it on food & energy, CPI excluding food, energy & taxes was +0.3%.

Gains were across the board, with the sectors impacted by the tax change seeing the most significant increase: recreation +3.4%, food +1.9%, clothing +1.6%, and alcohol +1.5% more to come next month, with the tax holiday only ending in mid-February. The headline inflation figures are subject to as much noise as we’ve seen in decades. They are poised to continue for at least another couple of months, making it very challenging to interpret the inflation data.

As a result, prices for food purchased from restaurants declined at a slower pace year over year in February (-1.4%) compared with January (-5.1%). Restaurant food prices contributed the most to the acceleration in the all-items CPI in February.

Similarly, on a yearly basis, alcoholic beverages purchased from stores declined 1.4% in February, following a 3.6% decline in January.

On a year-over-year basis, gasoline prices decelerated, with a 5.1% increase in February following an 8.6% gain in January. Prices rose less month over month in February 2025 compared with February 2024, when higher global crude oil prices pushed up gasoline prices, leading to slower year-over-year price growth in February 2025.

Month over month, gasoline prices rose 0.6% in February. This increase was primarily related to higher refining costs amid planned refinery maintenance across North America. This offset lower crude oil prices, mainly due to increased American supply and tariff threats, contributing to slowing global growth concerns.

Not surprisingly, the core inflation metrics were firm as well. CPI-Trim and Median both rose 0.3% m/m and 2.9% y/y. The 3- and 6-month annualized rates are all above 3% as well, pointing to ongoing stickiness. The breadth of inflation, which has been a focus for the Bank of Canada, also worsened with the share of items rising 3%+ increasing modestly. None of this is encouraging news for policymakers.

This report will reinforce the Bank of Canada’s cautious stance on easing to mitigate the impact of tariffs. Notably, the upcoming end of the carbon tax will cause inflation to drop sharply in April. However, March may see an increase in inflation as the effects of the tax holiday begin to reverse. There is still a lot of uncertainty surrounding inflation, which complicates the job of policymakers. We will see what April 2 brings regarding additional tariffs.

If the economic outlook did not worsen, the Bank of Canada might consider pausing after cutting rates at seven consecutive meetings. However, the Canadian economy will likely slow significantly in the coming months.

Bank of Canada Governor Tiff Macklem said last week the bank would “”roceed carefully””amid the tariff war. Economists are still awaiting more clarity on tariffs before firming up their expectations for the next rate decision on April 16, when policymakers will also update their forecasts. Right now, traders are betting that the BoC will hold rates steady in April, but a lot can and will happen before then.

Trade wars lead to higher prices and slower growth. The rise in prices causes consumers to tighten their belts, concerned about the impact of tariffs on their income and investments. Today, there is a 25% tariff on steel and aluminum exports to the US. This impacts Canada the most as it supplies roughly 80% of US aluminum demand. The EU introduced retaliatory tariffs on US goods in response. Canada added to its retaliation. Recent data suggest the US economy is slowing.

Monetary policy remains restrictive as the real overnight rate (2.75% minus the headline inflation rate) is 85 bps, up from the historical average of 60 bps. Five-year Government of Canada bond yields increased on the news to 2.65% compared to 4.05% in the US. The Federal Reserve is not expected to cut rates when it meets again this month.

Despite relatively strong GDP growth in Canada in the second half of last year, home sales and hiring began to slow in late January due to tariff threats, and more tariffs are yet to come. On March 20, China is expected to impose 100% retaliatory tariffs on Canadian canola oil, while pork and seafood will face a 25% levy. The Chinese tariffs are a push-back against Canada for imposing a 100% levy on electric cars from China and  25% on steel and aluminum.

On April 2, the US announced it will impose reciprocal tariffs on nations that have levied tariffs on US goods. President Trump has also said he is considering imposing retaliatory tariffs on Canadian dairy and lumber.

“We’re now facing a new crisis. The economic impact could be severe depending on the extent and duration of new US tariffs,” Macklem said in his prepared remarks.

Macklem called the uncertainty of the tariff dispute “pervasive” and said that it was “already causing harm.” Officials said the “continuously changing” US tariff threat was hitting consumers’ spending intentions and limiting businesses’ plans to hire and invest.

At the same time, Macklem said the bank “will proceed carefully with any further changes” to borrowing costs, and officials would “need to assess both the upward pressures on inflation from higher costs and the downward pressures from weaker demand.”

These are uncertain times. The US is determined to impose worldwide tariffs, disproportionately hitting Canada, Mexico, and China, the US’s top trading partners. This is a misguided neo-Mercantilist policy. Mercantilism assumes that the global economic pie is fixed, so if one country prospers, another must fail. This idea of a zero-sum game was debunked in the 18th century by Adam Smith and others who showed that if countries have a competitive advantage in various products and services, all are better off by producing and trading those products with the rest of the world. It is not a zero-sum game. The economic pie grows with trade. This was the idea behind globalization and the USMCA free trade agreement.

Given Canada’s vulnerability to tariffs, the economy will suffer more than the US, which has a relatively closed economy (where exports are a small proportion of GDP). Prices will rise depending on the duration and size of the coming tariffs, but mitigating the inflation will be the weakness in economic activity. Stagflation, a buzz-word in the 1970s, is back in the lexicon. We expect the BoC to continue cutting the policy rate in 25-bps increments until it reaches 2.25% this June, triggering a rebound in home sales. Layoffs and spending cuts will dampen sentiment, but lower interest rates will bring buyers off the sidelines.

The Wall Street Journal, typically considered a conservative publication, criticized Trump, labelling this as the “dumbest trade war in history.” The Journal stated, “Mr. Trump sometimes sounds as if the US shouldn’t import anything at all, that America can be a perfectly closed economy making everything at home. This is called autarky, and it isn’t the world we live in or one that we should want to live in, as Mr. Trump may soon find out.”

This misguided tariff policy will cause untold damage to the global economy, including the US. Americans will suffer the impact of higher prices and shortages of key products imported from Canada and Mexico. The various North American free trade agreements aimed to improve manufacturing efficiencies and meld the three economies to maximize productivity and the free flow of essential inputs into production. Canada is the number one supplier of steel and aluminum and there are no readily available substitutes for these crucial inputs. A plethora of products and construction activity use steel and aluminum. Aluminum is produced in Quebec where hydroelectricity is plentiful and cheap. US farmers depend on Canadian potash and auto parts, and Canada is the number one exporter of oil and gas to the US.

Consider the US auto industry, which operates as a North American entity due to the highly integrated supply chains across the three countries. In 2024, Canada supplied nearly 13% of US auto parts imports, while Mexico accounted for almost 42%. Industry experts note that a vehicle produced on the continent typically crosses borders multiple times as companies source components and add value most cost-effectively.

This integration benefits everyone involved. According to the Office of the US Trade Representative, the industry contributed more than $809 billion to the US economy in 2023, representing about 11.2% of total US manufacturing output and supporting 9.7 million direct and indirect US jobs. In 2022, the US exported $75.4 billion in vehicles and parts to Canada and Mexico. According to the American Automotive Policy Council, this figure rose 14% in 2023, reaching $86.2 billion.

Without this trade, American car makers would struggle to compete. Regional integration has become an industry-wide manufacturing strategy in Japan, Korea, and Europe. It leverages high-skilled and low-cost labour markets to source components, software, and assembly.

As a result, US industrial capacity in automobiles has grown alongside an increase in imported motor vehicles, engines, and parts. From 1995 to 2019, imports of these items rose by 169%, while US industrial capacity in the same categories increased by 71%. Thousands of well-paying auto jobs in states like Texas, Ohio, Illinois, and Michigan owe their competitiveness to this ecosystem, which relies heavily on suppliers in Mexico and Canada.

Tariffs will also cause mayhem in the cross-border trade of farm goods. In fiscal 2024, Mexican food exports comprised about 23% of US agricultural imports, while Canada supplied some 20%. Many top US growers have moved to Mexico because limits on legal immigration have made it hard to find workers in the US. Mexico now supplies 90% of avocados sold in the US.

Yesterday, the President’s tariff announcement led to an immediate sell-off in stock markets worldwide. Bonds, seen as a safer haven, rallied sharply, taking longer-term interest rates down sharply in anticipation of a meaningful slowdown in economic activity. The Canadian dollar sold off sharply, though it clawed back some of its losses overnight. WTI oil prices dropped 2% yesterday and continued to decline today.

Bottom Line

This is a lose-lose situation and President Trump underestimates the negative fallout of his actions at home and abroad. Retaliation will be swift. Americans will balk at the disruption of supply chains (think waiting for months for a new car) and the increase in the price of many products.

Legendary investor, Warren Buffet, called the tariffs an “act of war.”

Before the tariffs were imposed, we expected roughly 2% growth this year. Assuming the tariffs remain in place for a year, the Canadian economy will plunge into recession. We will likely see a few quarters of negative growth before growth gradually resumes.

Despite the inflation risk, the Bank of Canada will respond aggressively to minimize the meltdown in labour markets and the economy in general. When the Governing Council meets again on March 12, we expect another 25 bps cut in the overnight policy rate, bringing it down to 2.75%. Over the next year, we expect the Bank to continue to ease credit conditions, and a 2.0% overnight rate is likely.

The Canadian 5-year yield, a bellwether for setting fixed mortgage rates, has fallen to 2.51%, its lowest level in nearly three years. Lower interest rates are favorable for housing markets, although the inevitable rise in unemployment and drop in spending will mitigate this effect.

Although sales were down 3.3% month-over-month in January, this was mostly the result of sales trailing off in the last week of the month.

Meanwhile, the number of newly listed homes increased with an 11% jump compared to the final month of 2024. Aside from some of the wild swings seen during the pandemic, this was the largest seasonally adjusted monthly increase in new supply on record going back to the late 1980s.

“The standout trends to begin the year were a big jump in new supply at an uncommon time of year, as well as a weakening in sales which only showed up around the last week of January,” said Shaun Cathcart, CREA’s Senior Economist. “The timing of that change in demand leaves little doubt as to the cause – uncertainty around tariffs. Together with higher supply, this means markets that had been steadily tightening up since last fall are now suddenly in a softer pricing situation again, particularly in British Columbia and Ontario.”

With sales down amid a surge in new supply, the national sales-to-new listings ratio fell to 49.3% compared to readings in the mid-to-high 50s in the fourth quarter of last year. The long-term average for the national sales-to-new listings ratio is 55%, with readings between 45% and 65% generally consistent with balanced housing market conditions.

There were close to 136,000 properties listed for sale on all Canadian MLS® Systems at the end of January 2025, up 12.7% from a year earlier but still below the long-term average for that time of the year of around 160,000 listings.

“While we continue to anticipate a more active spring for the housing sector, the threat of a trade war with our largest trading partner is a major dark cloud on the horizon,” said James Mabey, CREA Chair. “While uncertainty about the economy and jobs will no doubt keep some prospective buyers on the sidelines, a softer pricing environment alongside lower interest rates will be an opportunity for others.”

There were 4.2 months of inventory on a national basis at the end of January 2025, up from readings in the high threes in October, November, and December. The long-term average is five months of inventory. Based on one standard deviation above and below that long-term average, a seller’s market would be below 3.6 months and a buyer’s market would be above 6.5 months.

The National Composite MLS® HPI has barely budged in the last year, owing to ongoing softness in B.C. and Ontario. This has offset rising prices on the Prairies, in Quebec, and across the East Coast.

The National Composite MLS® Home Price Index (HPI) changed slightly (-0.08%) from December 2024 to January 2025.

The non-seasonally adjusted National Composite MLS® HPI was unchanged (+0.07%) compared to January 2024. That said, it was technically the first year-over-year increase since last March.

The Bank of Canada’s aggressive rate cuts and regulatory changes aimed at making housing more affordable were offset last month by the increasing uncertainty surrounding a potential trade war with the United States. Tiff Macklem clearly recognizes from this report that significant uncertainty is detrimental to both the Canadian housing market and the broader economy. Our economy teeters on a precarious line between modest growth and recession. Before the tariff threats emerged, it seemed the housing market was poised for a strong rebound as we approached the spring selling season.

Unfortunately, the situation has only deteriorated, particularly as President Trump has repeatedly suggested that Canada could become the 51st state, further angering Canadians. While the first round effect of tariffs leads to higher prices as importers attempt to pass off the higher costs to consumers, second-round effects slow economic activity owing to layoffs and business and household belt tightening.

The Bank of Canada will no doubt come to the rescue slashing interest rates further. This is particularly important for Canada where interest-rate sensitivity is far higher than in the US.

According to Statistics Canada, employment increased by 76,000 last month, bringing the jobless rate down to 6.6%. Economists in a Bloomberg survey expected a smaller rise of 25,000 jobs, with the unemployment rate rising to 6.8%. This pattern of stronger-than-anticipated employment data has continued since November, with increases in both part-time and full-time work.

The employment rate—the proportion of the population aged 15 and older who are employed—increased 0.1 percentage points to 61.1% in January, marking the third consecutive monthly increase. These recent increases follow a period in which employment growth had been outpaced by population growth, resulting in the employment rate declining 1.7 percentage points from April 2023 to October 2024.

Manufacturing employment rose by 33,000 (+1.8%) in January, following an increase of 17,000 (+0.9%) in December. The increase in January was concentrated in Ontario (+11,000; +1.3%), Quebec (+9,700; +1.9%), and British Columbia (+8,700; +4.9%). Despite the gains in the past two months, overall employment in manufacturing changed little year over year in January.

Employment in professional, scientific, and technical services rose in January (+22,000; +1.1%), the second increase in the past three months. On a year-over-year basis, employment in the industry was up by 66,000 (+3.4%).

Employment also increased in accommodation and food services (+15,000; +1.3%), transportation and warehousing (+13,000; +1.2%) and agriculture (+10,000; +4.4%) in January. At the same time, there were fewer people employed in “other services” (which includes personal and repair services) (-14,000; -1.8%).

Many unemployed people are facing continued difficulties finding employment despite recent employment growth.

We expect the BoC to reduce the overnight rate from 3.00% today to 2.5% in quarter-point increments by the spring season. This should significantly boost Canadian housing market activity, particularly given the recent decline in mortgage rates.

Employment in manufacturing may be particularly susceptible to changes in tariffs and foreign demand. The sector has the most jobs dependent on US demand for Canadian exports,

According to the Labour Force Survey, there were 1.9 million people employed in manufacturing in January, comprising 8.9% of total employment—the fourth largest sector in Canada. As a total share of jobs, manufacturing employment has decreased over the years, particularly in the 2000s, but has been more stable since 2010.

Automotive manufacturing industries are highly integrated with US supply chains; an estimated 68.3% of jobs in these industries depend on US demand for Canadian exports. People working in automotive manufacturing (which includes motor vehicle manufacturing, motor vehicle parts manufacturing and motor vehicle body and trailer manufacturing) were concentrated in Southern Ontario, particularly in the economic regions of Toronto (which accounted for 27.7% of all auto workers), Kitchener–Waterloo–Barrie (19.8%) and Windsor-Sarnia (14.8%) in January. In Windsor-Sarnia, automotive manufacturing industries accounted for 38.3% of manufacturing employment and 7.3% of total employment (three-month moving averages, not seasonally adjusted).

In January 2025, a collective bargaining agreement covered over one-quarter (26.5%) of automotive manufacturing employees. In comparison, the union coverage rate in the automotive industry was nearly twice as high in January 2002 (49.9%).

In January, food manufacturing was the most significant manufacturing subsector overall, accounting for 16.4% of all manufacturing employment. It was also the largest subsector across all provinces except Ontario. This subsector relies less on foreign demand, with 28.8% of jobs dependent on US demand for Canadian exports.

The recent acceleration in job growth may not prevent the Bank of Canada from cutting interest rates further this year. The recent wave of hiring likely won’t be enough to placate concerns that a potential Canada-US trade war could plunge the economy into a recession. Still, overnight swap traders eased expectations for a cut at the March 12 meeting to about 60% from close to 80% previously. We expect another 25 bp rate cut at the March and June BoC meetings.

The data were released simultaneously with US nonfarm payrolls, which increased by 143,000 in January as the unemployment rate was 4%. The loonie reversed the day’s loss against the US dollar, trading at C$1.4300 as of 8:34 a.m. in Ottawa. Canada’s two-year yield rose some seven basis points to the session’s high of 2.65%, with Canadian debt underperforming the US and developed markets.

Heightened trade uncertainty will continue to plague Canadian business hiring and spending decisions. Consumers, as well, will likely moderate spending in response to the uncertainty.